The idea of trading Covid vs. Cancer should be anathema to the British people. It goes against one of the Core Values of the NHS, which is that:-
"We maximise our resources for the benefit of the whole community, and
Yet 'excluded' and 'left behind' is what has been happening since the start of the pandemic. The initial and necessary rush to create Nightingale hospitals and ensure that there were enough intensive care beds for the populace, has ossified into an unthinking view that Covid-related deaths are more important than those from any other cause.
This manifests itself in a decreasing level of care for Cancer patients; combined with political messaging from the Government that results in some potential patients not coming forward for diagnosis.
It is time to revisit this and reset the situation. This is particularly important with Cancer, where early and correct diagnosis is such an important part of the outcome. One feature of Covid is that seriously ill patients don't need telling that they should present themselves to hospital and seek help.
This rebalancing of care requires a change of Government policy, because the NHS is merely following where the Government leads.
This page is provided by Industry-19 to demonstrate the case for an alternative and better way forward, as called for by the wider Cancer community.
The world of Cancer care and support is surprisingly fragmented. In the UK the two largest charities attract the most attention, while numerous smaller charities carry on their work in parallel. Each of these focuses on their particular aims, such as nursing or children for example, creating a distributed, "market economy" type of support infrastructure.
Academic researchers are pursuing the subject, and drug companies are in competition with each other to develop treatments, but this
is the same for all illnesses. Pharma companies did collaborate much more openly in the quest for a
and it is an interesting question whether they might create better treatments for Cancer by collaborating in a similar way, but that is
a wider issue.
The NHS is the primary medical care provider, and also the arbiter of how much care is provided. And as the NHS follows Government instructions, it is at the Government level where change must be applied.
So far there has been no single voice representing patients as a whole, and as yet there is no clearly-defined course of action to remedy the situation.
The Case for Change
Examples of people dying preventable deaths, simply due to late diagnosis, are everywhere. In his article, Fraser Nelson (see Journalism) quotes one from his own experience, and goes on to say: I was thinking of her yesterday, when a study came out showing that 18 per cent fewer people were diagnosed with cancer last year – and you can bet that’s not because of a sudden plunge in illness. For breast cancer, it was 29 per cent. Prostate cancer: 51 per cent. We can only guess how many will now die who might have been saved. An estimate in The Lancet Oncology has put the total at about 3,500 avoidable cancer deaths from the first wave alone.
[...] Not so long ago, we saw official adverts urging us to seek NHS care if we felt a suspicious lump. Now, adverts in bus stops show the face of a Covid patient with an oxygen mask asking us to “look him in the eyes” and say if our journey is necessary. This changes the mood – and will obviously have consequences. Positive and negative.
There are two photos of similar young people in Angus Dalgliesh's article in the Daily Mail [ii]. He is a professor of oncology at the University of London, and he expressed it in more detail.
As the second wave of Covid-19 retreats, the devastating impact on cancer patients is becoming ever more apparent. We are now facing a savage new health crisis, one which may prove even more destructive than the pandemic itself. Life-saving operations have been postponed, vital treatments delayed and new cases missed as screening programmes have been cut back and GPs refer fewer cases.
He refers to a letter signed by 75 MPs, and backed by cancer charities, in which they warn that the current ‘Covid-induced’ backlog could lead to at least 35,000 excess deaths, but says: I fear that the signatories to the letter are greatly underestimating the scale of the problem. From the evidence I have seen, cancer referrals are down by no less than 50 per cent over the last quarter in many parts of the country, while cancer waiting times are now at their worst level on record. There isn’t a single NHS cancer specialist who hasn’t witnessed the suffering caused by this crisis.
Such agonising ordeals are being repeated thousands of times nationwide. [...] The tragedy is that if cancer is caught early, patient outcomes can be very positive because of the huge advances made in surgery, screening, scans, and chemotherapy. The dark days of 40 years ago, when a cancer diagnosis was likely to be a swift death sentence, have passed. Yet due to Covid hysteria we are squandering those gains.
There is another aspect to the crisis which illustrates the negative consequences of the Government’s
anti-Covid propaganda. It is the incidence of cancer patients themselves cancelling their scheduled hospital operations because they
fear catching Covid. That might seem a bizarre overreaction given that Covid – even for vulnerable people – is rarely fatal, while untreated cancer is
a certain killer.
For a more in-depth picture of the impact of Covid policies on Cancer care there is also a survey that was carried out by
Cancer Research UK in May 2020 [iii]. This runs to 31 pages, but
conveys a similar message.
Perhaps another illustration is Public Health England's own Campaign Resource Centre, which positions Covid-19 above all other health campaigns put together.
In order to rectify the situation, we need to step back and look at the whole picture. Detailed instances are evocative, but they cannot be used to set national policy.
Furthermore, Cancer is not the only serious illness to have been neglected during the pandemic. However, if we deal with Cancer it should correct the approach for everyone else.
Returning to the starting premise (above) that:-
then it is clear that the Government must cease to be biased, if it is to meet its own obligations of impartiality across the country.
It is not enough just to lobby for change - the Government will only enact change if it is shown how to do so. At present there are too many voices, in the Cancer field and beyond, and MPs are overwhelmed. Proponents of Cancer care need to produce a concentrated and specific set of instructions for the politicians to follow.
We therefore need to pull together as many as possible of the Cancer care proponents, and define what actual changes the Government needs to make.
Industry-19 can provide a platform for this. This begins with a Survey to poll the views of stakeholders and experts. It could lead to a Task Force that will take a more clinical and in-depth look at the statistics and options.
What We Need to Know
To create a clear picture of what is happening, and what needs to be done, we need answers to some very straightforward questions:-
The Survey makes it very easy for you to give your views on this.
Covid vs Cancer Survey
The purpose of this Survey is to establish whether there is a problem; if there is a problem, how does it manifest itself; and, if problems exist, what should be done to correct them.
The Survey will run until 23 April, after which everyone who takes part will receive a copy of the Results Document.
In the meantime, you can send general feedback, comment and suggestions on this subject via email@example.com.
© Copyright 2021 Industry-19 Group